Leonid Shmatenko is part of Eversheds Sutherlands’ data protection and technology law team. Post-verdict, a representative for Zynga expressed their satisfaction with the jury’s decision, stating to Law360, The hearing took place in Waco, presided over by U.S. It is noteworthy that the jury did not provide any specific reasoning behind their decision. Consequently, the jury ruled that no damages were to be paid by Zynga. The jury deemed these claims too obvious to warrant a patent. They found that not only did Zynga not directly infringe the patent claims through its aforementioned gaming apps, but also that the claims in the patent-in-suit were invalid. However, the jury’s verdict was in favor of Zynga. Specifically, they alleged that Zynga’s gaming products, namely Hit It Rich, Game of Thrones Slots, and Black Diamond Casino, directly infringed upon the patented claims. IGT’s contention was that Zynga, a San Francisco-based game developer famed for its creation of Farmville, among other online games, had violated their patent rights. The patent in question pertains to a “mobile gaming device carrying out uninterrupted game despite communications link disruption.” This patent was developed by International Game Technology, a Las Vegas-based gambling software company. The lawsuit was initiated by IGT and IGT Canada Solutions ULC, who accused Zynga of infringing their U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |